Canadian grain groups are taking a fresh look at pressing government officials to enact legislation that would address how the country can continue shipping grain and grain products in the event of a strike or other work stoppage, FreightWaves reports.
One option the groups have mentioned is finding a legislator to introduce a bill declaring rail an essential service. The Public Service Labor Relations Act defines an essential service as “a service, facility or activity of the Government that is or will be, at any time, necessary for the safety or security of the public of a segment of the public.”
“The significance of declaring [rail] as an essential service is that strikes or lockouts would become unlawful. They would have to resolve their collective bargaining agreement through binding arbitration instead, but goods would continue to flow,” said Wade Sobkowich, executive director for the Western Grain Elevator Association (WGEA).
Grain groups had considered pressing for that option in the past. The November strike at CN revived the discussion. Members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, including CN train crews and yard workers, went on strike Nov. 19, 2019. The strike ended Nov. 26, but it hit supply chains across Canada, bringing trade disruptions, goods shortages and layoffs.
Declaring rail an essential service was one of the items that WGEA lobbied for during the 2014 and 2015 revision of the Canada Transportation Act, Sobkowich said. That revision eventually became the Transportation Modernization Act, and it addresses grain-related issues such as maximum revenue entitlement and incentives to the railways to invest in capital infrastructure for the western grain rail network.
With the May 2018 strike at Canadian Pacific and the recent CN strike, “there is a more focused effort to include rail as an essential service in our list of asks of the federal government, not only by the WGEA but by other sectors and producer groups,” Sobkowich said.
Grain associations say they are held hostage by a “dual monopoly” consisting of the railways and the unions. If the union strikes, many have limited options, and as a result, they can end up slowing production if they run out of storage. They can also run up costs resulting from railcar demurrage charges, contract extension penalties, contract defaults or lost sales.
Although the union and CN resolved the strike in eight days, stakeholders, including the grain groups, said it would take weeks for the supply chain to return to normal.
“Any pause in service almost immediately reverberates throughout our supply chain,” said Chris Vervaet, Executive Director of the Canadian Oilseed Processors Association, a group that represents producers who make canola oil and canola meal.
The Grain Growers of Canada is still weighing its options, including whether to join the call asking to declare rail as essential service. But “whatever approach we take is going to be one that ensures that our sector will be offered some form of reassurance that we will never see an interruption in rail service,” said Executive Director Erin Gowriluk.
“Our sector faces—collectively, this country faces—fairly regular threats with respect to strikes, whether that is CP or CN. Sometimes it feels like once or twice a year,” Gowriluk said. “We recognize as we said during the strike that the ability to negotiate—that’s not something that we want to interfere with. … But what we do need is some reassurance that while those negotiations are ongoing, that rail service continues and that the Canadian economy cannot be used as leverage or cannot be held hostage.”
Joanna Marsh is a Washington, D.C.-based writer for FreightWaves covering the freight railroad industry. She has worked for Argus Media as a contributing reporter for Argus Rail Business and as a market reporter for Argus Coal Daily.