EC blocks Siemens-Alstom merger

Written by Keith Barrow, Senior Editor, International Railway Journal
image description

European Commission Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager.

The European Commission (EC) announced Feb. 6 that it has blocked the merger of Siemens Mobility and Alstom on the grounds that the two companies have failed to address its concerns over competition on the markets for signaling and high-speed rolling stock.

The two companies confirmed immediately after the Commission’s announcement that the merger will not go ahead.

The decision to reject the merger follows an in-depth investigation launched in July 2018 that considered more than 800,000 documents. During the investigation, the EC received complaints from customers, competitors, national competition authorities, industry associations and trade unions, many of whom expressed concern over the impact on the signaling and high-speed markets.

Last October, the Commission invited the two suppliers to respond to a Statement of Objection outlining its concerns. Siemens and Alstom subsequently put forward remedy packages in a bid to secure EC approval.

However, this failed to quell the fears of negative impacts in certain sectors of the industry, and the EC concluded that the remedies failed to “fully address [its] competition concerns on a lasting basis.”

“The merger would have created the undisputed market leader in some signaling markets and a dominant player in very-high-speed trains,” the EC said in a statement on Feb. 6. “It would have significantly reduced competition in both these areas, depriving customers, including train operators and rail infrastructure managers of a choice of suppliers and products.”

In the signaling sector, the EC claims the merged entity would have dominated the supply of ETCS (both onboard and trackside systems) within the European Economic Area (EEA) as well as the market for interlocking systems in several member states. It would also have become the market leader in CBTC (communications-based train control).

The two manufacturers offered to divest a “complex mix” of assets in the signaling sector, with some assets wholly or partially transferred and others licensed or copied. The EC says business units and production sites would have been split, with staff transfers in some cases. It also found that the buyer would continue to depend on the merged entity for several license and service agreements. The EC therefore concluded that the signaling remedy did not offer prospective buyers a future-proof business capable of competition effectively with Siemens-Alstom.

In the high-speed rolling stock sector, the EC says the merger would have eliminated one of the largest players, giving the merged entity “very high market shares” both within the EEA and globally, with the exception of China, Japan and Korea. The Commission says Siemens and Alstom failed to offer any substantiated arguments explaining why the transaction would generate merger-specific efficiencies.

The two companies offered to divest Alstom’s Pendolino or offer a license for Siemens’ next-generation Velaro Novo high-speed train. However, the Commission says the license was “subject to multiple restrictive terms and carve-outs that essentially would not have given the buyer the ability and incentive to develop a competing very-high-speed train in the first place.”

“Siemens and Alstom are both champions in the rail industry,” said EC Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager. “Without sufficient remedies, this merger would have resulted in higher prices for the systems that keep passengers safe and for the next generations of very-high-speed trains. The Commission prohibited the merger because the companies were not willing to address our serious competition concerns.”

Chinese competition

As part of its investigation, the Commission studied the competitive landscape beyond the EEA with a particular focus on possible future competition from Chinese suppliers in international markets.

“Our assessment looked at likelihood of Chinese companies entering the market, not in the abstract but completely,” Vestager said at Feb. 6 press conference. “CRRC has more than 90% of activities in China. No Chinese supplier has participated in a signaling contract in Europe. There’s no prospect of Chinese entry into the European market in near future. If you look at the part of the global market that is contestable, Siemens and Alstom are very impressive companies. There are no CRRC very high-speed trains running outside China. If you look at demands in Europe in terms of security and references [in high-speed rolling stock tenders], this is a much more demanding task than having new tracks and running trains on new tracks. We don’t see the Chinese coming into the very-high-speed train market.”

Vestager argues that Europe’s single market has given Siemens and Alstom the foundation to become industrial champions. “The fact that the single market is so big allows companies to grow to a size that allows them to become global competitors,” she says. “If we didn’t have the single market it would be difficult for businesses like Siemens and Alstom to grow to a size to become competitive in the global marketplace.”

Even before Vestager’s announcement, the French government was already lamenting the EC’s ruling. “The role of the European Commission, the role of the European institutions, is to defend the economic and industrial interests of Europe,” French Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire said in an interview on television station France 2. “This decision will serve the economic interests and industry of China. The Commission tells us that the European market is not open to the Chinese giant. I believe exactly the opposite. I think that in a very short time, we will see CRRC arrive in Europe.”

“Clear setback”

Alstom said the ruling is a “clear setback for industry in Europe” and argues the transaction would have created substantial value for the global mobility sector, customers, and passengers without harming competition.

“Alstom regrets that the remedies offered, including recent improvements, have been considered insufficient by the Commission,” the company said in a statement. “The remedies were extensive in scope and addressed all the concerns raised by the Commission in respect of signaling or very-high-speed trains. In addition, a number of credible and well-established European players expressed strong interest for the remedy package, thereby fully confirming its viability.”

Alstom said it will now develop a new strategic roadmap including appropriate capital allocation.

Bouygues, which owns a 28% stake in Alstom, said in a statement that it backs the company’s strategy and remains confident about the future of the business.

Siemens said it will “take the time to assess all options for the future of Siemens Mobility and choose the best for its customers, its employees and its shareholders.”

More on this topic: Siemens-Alstom merger in doubt as objections mount.

Categories: C&S, Commuter/Regional, High Performance, Intercity, Light Rail, Locomotives, News, Passenger, Rapid Transit, Regulatory Tags: , , ,